Skip to main content
Deep Learning Landscape

The Deep Learning Landscape

The Timeline That Changed Everything

Let’s start with some perspective. Here’s what happened:
YearBreakthroughImpact
1958PerceptronFirst learning machine (couldn’t solve XOR)
1986BackpropagationTraining multi-layer networks became possible
2006Deep Belief NetworksShowed deep networks could be trained
2012AlexNetWon ImageNet by huge margin, started the revolution
2014GANsGenerating realistic images
2015ResNet152-layer networks that actually train
2017TransformerAttention is all you need
2018BERTLanguage understanding breakthrough
2020GPT-3Few-shot learning at scale
2022ChatGPTAI goes mainstream
2023GPT-4Multimodal reasoning
2024SoraVideo generation from text
The common thread: Every breakthrough came from making networks deeper, feeding them more data, and training with more compute.
🔗 Connection: The methods you’ll learn in this course — backpropagation, attention, normalization — are the exact techniques powering these breakthroughs. We’re not teaching theory for theory’s sake; we’re teaching the building blocks of modern AI.

Deep Learning vs. Machine Learning

Let’s be precise about what we mean:
ML vs Deep Learning

Traditional Machine Learning

# Traditional ML: YOU design the features
import numpy as np
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier

# Feature engineering (manual)
def extract_features(image):
    features = []
    features.append(np.mean(image))  # brightness
    features.append(np.std(image))   # contrast
    features.append(count_edges(image))  # edges
    features.append(color_histogram(image))  # colors
    # ... 100 more hand-crafted features
    return np.array(features)

# Train on hand-crafted features
X = np.array([extract_features(img) for img in images])
model = RandomForestClassifier()
model.fit(X, labels)
Problems:
  • Feature engineering is time-consuming
  • Requires domain expertise
  • Features may not capture what matters
  • Doesn’t scale to complex patterns

Deep Learning

# Deep Learning: The network LEARNS the features
import torch
import torch.nn as nn

class CNN(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self):
        super().__init__()
        # Network learns features automatically
        self.conv1 = nn.Conv2d(3, 32, 3)
        self.conv2 = nn.Conv2d(32, 64, 3)
        self.conv3 = nn.Conv2d(64, 128, 3)
        self.fc = nn.Linear(128 * 4 * 4, 10)
    
    def forward(self, x):
        x = F.relu(self.conv1(x))  # learns edges
        x = F.relu(self.conv2(x))  # learns shapes
        x = F.relu(self.conv3(x))  # learns objects
        return self.fc(x.flatten(1))

# Train end-to-end
model = CNN()
# Just give it raw pixels — it figures out the features!
Benefits:
  • Learns features automatically
  • Scales to complex patterns
  • Transfers across tasks
  • State-of-the-art performance

When to Use What

ScenarioBest ChoiceWhy
Small dataset (<1000 samples)Traditional MLDeep learning overfits
Tabular dataTraditional ML (XGBoost)Often beats deep learning
Images, audio, textDeep LearningHierarchical patterns
Limited computeTraditional MLDeep learning is expensive
Need interpretabilityTraditional MLDeep learning is a “black box”
Massive data availableDeep LearningBenefits from scale
Don’t be a “deep learning hammer”: Deep learning isn’t always the answer. Gradient boosting (XGBoost, LightGBM) still often wins on tabular data. Understand your problem before reaching for neural networks.

The Deep Learning Ecosystem

Major Application Domains

Computer Vision

  • Image classification
  • Object detection (YOLO, Faster R-CNN)
  • Segmentation
  • Face recognition
  • Medical imaging
  • Autonomous vehicles

Natural Language Processing

  • Text classification
  • Machine translation
  • Question answering
  • Summarization
  • Chatbots (ChatGPT)
  • Code generation (Copilot)

Speech & Audio

  • Speech recognition (Whisper)
  • Text-to-speech
  • Music generation
  • Audio classification
  • Voice cloning

Generative AI

  • Image generation (DALL-E, Stable Diffusion)
  • Video generation (Sora)
  • 3D model generation
  • Code generation
  • Drug discovery

The Architecture Zoo

ArchitectureDomainKey Idea
CNN (1998)VisionLocal patterns with convolutions
RNN/LSTM (1997)SequencesMemory for temporal dependencies
Transformer (2017)EverythingAttention over all positions
GAN (2014)GenerationAdversarial training
VAE (2013)GenerationProbabilistic latent space
Diffusion (2020)GenerationIterative denoising
Graph NN (2017)GraphsMessage passing on structure
The Transformer Takeover: Transformers have largely replaced RNNs for sequences and are increasingly competing with CNNs for vision (Vision Transformer, ViT). By the end of this course, you’ll understand why.

Key Concepts Overview

Before we dive into details, here’s a map of what you’ll learn:

The Learning Process

1. FORWARD PASS
   Input → [Layer 1] → [Layer 2] → ... → [Layer N] → Prediction
   
2. LOSS COMPUTATION
   Compare Prediction vs. Ground Truth → Loss Value
   
3. BACKWARD PASS (Backpropagation)
   Compute gradients of loss w.r.t. each parameter
   
4. PARAMETER UPDATE
   parameters = parameters - learning_rate × gradients
   
5. REPEAT for all data, many epochs

What Makes Deep Networks Work

ComponentWhat It DoesAnalogy
LayersTransform data step by stepAssembly line workers
WeightsLearnable parametersWorker’s skill levels
ActivationsNon-linear functionsDecision gates
LossMeasures errorQuality inspector
OptimizerUpdates weightsManager adjusting workers
BackpropComputes gradientsFeedback mechanism

Your First Neural Network

Let’s build a simple network to classify handwritten digits (MNIST):
import torch
import torch.nn as nn
import torch.optim as optim
from torchvision import datasets, transforms
from torch.utils.data import DataLoader

# 1. LOAD DATA
transform = transforms.Compose([
    transforms.ToTensor(),
    transforms.Normalize((0.1307,), (0.3081,))
])

train_data = datasets.MNIST('./data', train=True, download=True, transform=transform)
test_data = datasets.MNIST('./data', train=False, transform=transform)

train_loader = DataLoader(train_data, batch_size=64, shuffle=True)
test_loader = DataLoader(test_data, batch_size=1000)

# 2. DEFINE NETWORK
class SimpleNet(nn.Module):
    def __init__(self):
        super().__init__()
        self.flatten = nn.Flatten()
        self.fc1 = nn.Linear(28 * 28, 512)
        self.fc2 = nn.Linear(512, 256)
        self.fc3 = nn.Linear(256, 10)
        self.relu = nn.ReLU()
        self.dropout = nn.Dropout(0.2)
    
    def forward(self, x):
        x = self.flatten(x)
        x = self.dropout(self.relu(self.fc1(x)))
        x = self.dropout(self.relu(self.fc2(x)))
        return self.fc3(x)

model = SimpleNet()
print(f"Parameters: {sum(p.numel() for p in model.parameters()):,}")

# 3. SETUP TRAINING
criterion = nn.CrossEntropyLoss()
optimizer = optim.Adam(model.parameters(), lr=0.001)

# 4. TRAINING LOOP
def train_epoch(model, loader, criterion, optimizer):
    model.train()
    total_loss = 0
    correct = 0
    
    for batch_idx, (data, target) in enumerate(loader):
        optimizer.zero_grad()        # Clear gradients
        output = model(data)          # Forward pass
        loss = criterion(output, target)  # Compute loss
        loss.backward()               # Backward pass
        optimizer.step()              # Update weights
        
        total_loss += loss.item()
        pred = output.argmax(dim=1)
        correct += pred.eq(target).sum().item()
    
    return total_loss / len(loader), 100. * correct / len(loader.dataset)

# 5. EVALUATION
def evaluate(model, loader, criterion):
    model.eval()
    total_loss = 0
    correct = 0
    
    with torch.no_grad():
        for data, target in loader:
            output = model(data)
            total_loss += criterion(output, target).item()
            pred = output.argmax(dim=1)
            correct += pred.eq(target).sum().item()
    
    return total_loss / len(loader), 100. * correct / len(loader.dataset)

# 6. TRAIN!
for epoch in range(1, 11):
    train_loss, train_acc = train_epoch(model, train_loader, criterion, optimizer)
    test_loss, test_acc = evaluate(model, test_loader, criterion)
    print(f"Epoch {epoch}: Train Acc: {train_acc:.2f}%, Test Acc: {test_acc:.2f}%")
Expected Output:
Parameters: 535,818
Epoch 1: Train Acc: 93.82%, Test Acc: 96.51%
Epoch 2: Train Acc: 97.42%, Test Acc: 97.33%
...
Epoch 10: Train Acc: 99.12%, Test Acc: 98.15%
Congratulations! You just trained a neural network that’s 98% accurate at recognizing handwritten digits.

Understanding What Happened

Let’s break down what the network learned:

Visualizing Learned Features

import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

# Get first layer weights
weights = model.fc1.weight.data.cpu().numpy()

# Visualize some learned features
fig, axes = plt.subplots(4, 8, figsize=(16, 8))
for i, ax in enumerate(axes.flat):
    # Reshape weight to 28x28 image
    feature = weights[i].reshape(28, 28)
    ax.imshow(feature, cmap='RdBu', vmin=-0.3, vmax=0.3)
    ax.axis('off')
plt.suptitle("First Layer Learned Features")
plt.show()
You’ll see that the first layer learns patterns like:
  • Edges at different orientations
  • Curve detectors
  • Stroke patterns
This is the network discovering, on its own, that these patterns are useful for digit recognition!

What Each Layer Does

LayerInput ShapeOutput ShapeWhat It Learns
fc1784 (28×28)512Low-level patterns (edges, strokes)
fc2512256Mid-level combinations (curves, corners)
fc325610Digit-specific patterns

The Deep Learning Mindset

It’s All About Representations

The key insight: Deep learning is about learning good representations of your data.
Raw Pixels → [Layer 1: Edges] → [Layer 2: Shapes] → [Layer 3: Parts] → [Layer 4: Digits]
Each layer transforms the representation into something more useful for the final task.

The Three Pillars

PillarWhat It MeansHow to Get It
DataMore data = better modelsWeb scraping, data augmentation, synthetic data
ComputeMore GPUs = larger modelsCloud computing, efficient architectures
AlgorithmsBetter architecturesResearch, this course!

Empirical Science

Deep learning is highly empirical. Unlike traditional algorithms where you can prove properties mathematically, deep learning requires:
  1. Experimentation: Try different architectures
  2. Ablation studies: Remove components to see what matters
  3. Hyperparameter tuning: Search for the best settings
  4. Visualization: Look at what your model learned
Expect to iterate: Your first model will rarely be your best. Budget time for experimentation.

Common Mistakes for Beginners

MistakeWhy It’s WrongBetter Approach
Jumping to deep learningMay not need itStart with a baseline (logistic regression, random forest)
Not normalizing inputsUnstable trainingNormalize to mean=0, std=1
Wrong loss functionModel won’t learn properlyClassification → Cross-entropy, Regression → MSE
Learning rate too highTraining divergesStart with 0.001, reduce if unstable
Not enough dataModel overfitsData augmentation, transfer learning
Training too longOverfittingUse early stopping based on validation loss

What’s Next

Now that you understand the landscape, we’ll dive into the fundamentals:

Exercises

Modify the MNIST network above:
  1. What happens if you remove the hidden layers (just fc1 → fc3)?
  2. What if you make it deeper (add fc4)?
  3. What if you change the hidden layer sizes?
Track how accuracy changes with each modification.
Create a confusion matrix showing which digits the model confuses:
from sklearn.metrics import confusion_matrix
import seaborn as sns

# Collect all predictions
all_preds = []
all_targets = []
model.eval()
with torch.no_grad():
    for data, target in test_loader:
        pred = model(data).argmax(dim=1)
        all_preds.extend(pred.numpy())
        all_targets.extend(target.numpy())

cm = confusion_matrix(all_targets, all_preds)
plt.figure(figsize=(10, 8))
sns.heatmap(cm, annot=True, fmt='d')
plt.xlabel('Predicted')
plt.ylabel('True')
plt.show()
Which pairs of digits are most commonly confused? Why might that be?
Train a Random Forest on the same MNIST data and compare:
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier

# Flatten images for sklearn
X_train = train_data.data.numpy().reshape(-1, 784)
y_train = train_data.targets.numpy()
X_test = test_data.data.numpy().reshape(-1, 784)
y_test = test_data.targets.numpy()

rf = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100, random_state=42)
rf.fit(X_train, y_train)
print(f"Random Forest Accuracy: {rf.score(X_test, y_test):.4f}")
How does it compare to the neural network? When might you prefer Random Forest?